The shortage of houses and offices has long been a thorny problem in Hong Kong because of the low quantity of land supply. People believe that the decision of the out of date manufactureings screwing free some rooms to give new ones. In my opinion, protecting antiquated building is polar in three main argonas that collaboratively support my argument. One of the major points is that protecting the heritage is to chase Hong Kongs history. While this is true to legion(predicate) Hong Kong citizens, some old buildings were treated as a cozy intercourse to legion(predicate) people. Would you feel happy that someone destroys your family? In fact, we pile recognize our cultural identity helped by bodied warehousing so that we know where we are from and who we are. Secondly, protecting heritage sess benefit Hong Kongs tourism. This is undoubtedly true that many tourists want to experience the unique cultures of the places they visit. Those historic sites are the figure of the city, they are very attractive to the tourists. This brings me to my third point.
It is because some old buildings were super unique. Those could be representing the revolution of the building method. For instance, the Wan Chai market place was the notwithstanding Bauhaus-style building in Hong Kong. Defending these unique old buildings can enhance the image of Hong Kong. All in all, I retrieve that if the government renews the valuable old buildings not just make it our culture but also can be act with the demand of houses and offices. On the other hand, we could satisfy the star and de monstrator needs.If you want to get a full e! ssay, tack together it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment