This assignment is on the pros and cons of the majority rules system in Australia.

legal age Rules Verdict A. Outline the minds that start happen to this law being changed. The bug out Rules Verdict is in gear up in a smattering of states in Australia. The main agreements for changing the standard laws for jury Verdicts to Majority Rules, is that it is very expensive to aliment 12 jurors penned up in a hotel for a some age to even weeks, wholly because ace person refuses to train with the stick. Another important reason is that the Majority Rules Verdict is less(prenominal) time consuming and result allow for more cases to be heard. Also it is important that the jurors contribute get back to their figure lives, instead of days penned up in a hotel near a case. B.Discuss the effects (both constructive and negative) this law change impart have on the community POSITIVE - superstar reason is to minimise the number of juries that hang. If your jury hangs, you feel you have vitiated the courts time; lessened money and more signifi give notic etly wasted your own time. - Cases involving hung juries dont have to take many days to dethaw the problems. Thus, cases can be heard and a finding of accompaniment can be a lot quicker if bulk rules verdict is used. - Majority rules verdict overcomes the problem of the rogue or perverse juror who refuses to listen to the other jurors or the evidence.

negatively charged -In idealistic circumstances, someone may be wrongly sentenced because of the bulk rules verdict. Where the one person against the jury could have actually persuade the rest of the jury. -It upholds the requirement of proof beyond commonsensib le doubt. Allowing a juror to dissent from a! verdict of guilty authority that at least one juror had a reasonable doubt, which can create uncertainty in the conviction. C. Write a letter... If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper