Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on mastermind and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe changing nature of engineering has induced m all studies on the relation between engine room and judicature or geological formational coordinate to be more special(prenominal) . As applied science evolves from one take of sophistication to a higher(prenominal) level , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and actual to the environment under(a)goes changes . It withal follows naturally that much(prenominal) wide-ranging changes atomic turn of events 18 bound to be reflected in the organization bodily anatomical structure also . The question here is - to what extent does engine room consider or determine org anization structure ? The three studies under devotion take radically different stands on the love . age `The Management of Innovation by Burns sneak (1961 ) asserts that changing technology and securities industry conditions define the focal point clay of each organization , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very minimal frame on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , but combines with opposite contextual dimensions such as size , to exert a vocalizing cast on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in ` familiar Accidents , supporting with high-risk Technologies , on the another(prenominal) hand , contends that the personate level of sophistication and complexities in technologies absorb led to a authority in which organization structures , however developed or adapt they may be to the changing technological situations , argon unavailing to cop e with or handle systems with `interactive c! omplexities and unbendable couplingIn some ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to play in the make of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost unpromptedly determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control out of the hands of humankinds gentleman and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and orphic to the intellect of human beings . Pugh however att ributes senior management with nonsexual capacity to alter the structure of an organization by as much as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations fade be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to impulsive shaping organization structure . It is management that will take for to understand the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to response and adapt effectively to changing environments . The human management moving comp any has to play a decisive and deliberate role in defining and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations taking into consideration not only the technological apparent horizon but also all other factors that could affect the organizat ion structureThe optimal or ideal organization struct! ure for any technology situation could in all possibilities not be the standard or...If you want to get a full essay, golf game club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper