Bill Gates and I Have the Same Property Essay

The regimen does non have the emancipation to interfere into the property of an possessor and the possessors right to exercise power on the property. This statement whitethorn be evaluated with the following example. An anti-trust action was passed against Microsoft Corporation by the service attorney usual of the Justice Department who ch on the wholeenged that the company cannot make it earthly concerndatory on customers to install the internet browser of Microsoft while installing the Microsoft 95 run system. The Government also upheld the notion that it is not necessary for consumers to use mavin product of a company simultaneously when another product is installed.The flirt ordered the separation of Microsoft 95 and Internet explorer. In continuation to this verdict, the Assistant Attorney General further de adult maleded the unusual freedom to scrutinise all future products of Microsoft Corporation to check their marketing strategy. Microsoft retaliated that if addi tional facilities in the computer indicate unfair trade practice, the manufacture of computer itself would be the like posing threat to the manufacturers of products like calculator, typewriter and the like.Though the Assistant Attorney General justified that the anti trust motion is aimed to stimulate innovation and tilt thither were several obstacles to substantiate its stand to stop Microsoft from gaining market accountant (Labaton, 1997). According to eyeshade Gates, the separation of the operating system and the browser would cerebrate producing products with lesser measure and reducing the demand for the operating system in the market despite enhancing the quality (Thibodeau, 2008).In the Second Treatise of Government, John Locke justifies that man can have a right on property found on the join of flirt he has done to transform the resources provided by God. The amount of do work done by a person enables him to class the common resources provided by God and own a p art of it by himself. Thus private ownership of property is related to the amount of work done by man. The spoilage proviso limits the amount of resources a man can reserve when the resource is wasted and the sufficiency proviso limits the amount of resources to be owned and the balance to be left with the nature for others.And when there are no more resources available, people are required to work on the available resources for sustenance. According to Locke, when individuals own resources or devour, they take crack care of it rather than when the land is not owned by anyone. When land is owned the productivity is estimated a ten times its actual value and it will pave way for the betterment of life. Here labor is disposed(p) more importance than on resources. When a person works on a resource it is automatically transformed into the workers property. It is the duty of the government to comfort the right of a person towards a property (Meinhardt, 2007).James capital of Wisconsi n has defined the ownership and rights to use a property. He has stated that when a person has a right to property, it is equal to having a property in his own rights. Hence the governments interference into the affairs of a property or assembly line owned by an individual when the business is meant for public use is not fair. Therefore the government should make it top off that the property owned by a person or incorporate may be put into full use according to the craving of the owner if the use of the property adds values and the deletion of certain facilities subordinate the value of the property.When certain use of a property is taken off by legal and governmental restrictions, the owner cannot exercise his fundamental freedom to exercise his right on the property (Pilon, 1995). In conclusion, governments do not have the authority to interfere into the rights of a property owner if the owner is a multi billionaire or a common person. Reference Labaton, S. December 22, 1997 . Bill Gates, Meet Your Adversary, the Antitrust Chief. Available http//query. nytimes. com/gst/fullpage. html? res=9D04E7DF143EF931A15751C1A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1. Accessed on September 8, 2008 Meinhardt, E. F. May 22, 2007.Critical Analysis of John Lockes speculation on Property Rights. Available http//www. scribd. com/doc/93360/John-Locke-on-Property-Rights. Accessed on September 8, 2008. Pilon, R. February 10, 1995. protect Private Property Rights from Regulatory return key. Breathe New Life Into the Takings Clause. Available http//www. cato. org/testimony/ct-pi210. html. Accessed on September 8, 2008. Thibodeau, P. June 30, 2008. For Bill Gates, antitrust rubbish was a personal crucible. http//www. thestandard. com/news/2008/06/30/bill-gates-antitrust-fight-was-personal-crucible? page=0%2C1. Accessed on September 8, 2008.