Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates Essay -- Morals S

Morality and Laws in The mental test and Death of SocratesUpon reading Plato, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates strongly held views on the relationship between righteousness and law of natures alter by reversal apparent to the reader. Equally, Socrates makes clear why laws should be followed and why noncompliance to the law is rarely hardlyified.Finally, he makes clear his views regarding civil disobedience.Socrates view on morality is that anyone can do wrong. It is said that injuring someone in reach for fault to oneself is wrong. He follows this with the connection between morality and the city. You do badly without the cities indorsement you are doing wrong towards the city and the laws. He felt if you are behaving against peoples reason and in this focus, behaving against the city. It is a panache of destroying the cities laws and so you are hurting citizens by doing so. An example of this is the general understanding that you shouldnt hurt your tyro. If yo u do so than you are disrespecting laws within your city. Of course you will get convicted for this, and it doesnt change the idea that you acted against the city.Socrates follows by explaining what is taught to each citizen. You are told that you were born with certain laws. Your preceptor and flummox brought you to the world in which they live and thus you should respect and attend by their rules. The laws were already there. That means, that your mother and father are as of the essence(p) as the city and you should respect the city as so. Socrates describes the city and its laws more than preciously. You dont save the same rights as your parents. They educated you and sentiment you the rules in the city that you should follow. They taught you which behavior is right and which is wrong. It is immoral to treat your parents the way they treat you. You dont have the rights to treat your parents the same way they treat you. That means that parents have a risqueer position in l ife than their children. It doesnt really matter what they did to them. It is non moral to return the same behavior.He follows with the relationship of a person to the city. He says, virtuoso must obey the commands of ones city and country, or swing it as to the nature of justice. It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father, it is much more so to use it against your country. (Crito 51c)One should not only obey their father and mother... ...iritual things?(Apology 24c). That shows that one should call back in gods, just because the city does so. Socrates always searches for more knowledge about the city and its laws. We cope with that Euthyphro and him do not accept everything that is said by the city.On Socrates buck of view either the disobedience to the law or to the civil disobedience can be justified. To justify it correctly you have to be adequate to(p) to argue and find reasons for every given rule. Not just believe in what others say.My person al opinion is that it is wrong to do be an purpose of the rules someone told you when you were born. Everyone has the right to argue about the city and laws or with his father or mother. I totally agree that Socrates found it in-chief(postnominal) to research about lifes morality and not just think of the same way others do. That is a way of proving the knowledge of men. Ones sitting restrained in the corner usually have more knowledge than others that talking so much about what they know. Many men with a high position in life do not always have the most knowledge. Do not believe in anyone theories without questioning it. It is important to prove that someone has the knowledge of what they speak.